No subject

[integer at www.god-emil.dk]

From: "cindy l" <cindylap at hotmail.com>
To: 55 at bek.no
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 19:29:57 +0300
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 May 2002 16:29:57.0910 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD9DCB60:01C205
9B]
Subject: /55\re:
Sender: 55-admin at bek.no
Errors-To: 55-admin at bek.no
X-BeenThere: 55 at bek.no
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: 55 at bek.no
List-Id:  <55.bek.no>


>>do you touch? are you touched?

you still didn't answer... i wonder why you boys allways run away from what 
really matters...

>ugly body's can touch aswell so can ugl! txt's.

there are no ugly texts, there are good texts and bad texts, like 
performers, isn't it? i was referring to the good one's, but, there again, 
what is good for me may not be good for the rest... the eternal paradigm+a

>i dont particularly like "nice"

there we go again... for beauty is the terror of all things... bla bla bla. 
but you know, 'nice' is my nickname. don't you like me?

>>wich perception of happiness would u like to be real ?

>i particularly like the "papillions dans le ventre" happiness,..and u ?
i wouldn't call it 'papillons', specially if it's 'dans le ventre', but 'le 
ventre'... ouep! vive le ventre!!! s'il n'est pas mort...

maybe i would call 'happiness' to touch. what do you think?