\ \ the only problem with perfection is finding the ...
integer at www.god-emil.dk
integer at www.god-emil.dk
Sat Mar 9 01:54:06 CET 2002
From: cerberus <cerberus at erols.com>
>Netochka Nezvanova writes:
>
>>
>>
>> /_/
>> /
>> \ \/ i should like to be a human plant
>> \/ __
>> __/
>> i will shed leaves in the shade
>> \_\ because i like stepping on bugs
>>
>>
>>
>> *--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
>(sic)
>
>
>
>
>
>your software sounds interesting, but i am not sure what it is.
>
>
>
>
>... or even what computer platform it runs on.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>your autumn 2000 article in Computer Music Journal seemed much more coherent
>than your posts here, it cost me $14.
>
>
>
>
>if you are a professional writer i can see why you would want to deprive the
>"free"sound list of your completely written paragraphs.
>
>
>
>
>
>the ascii art is nice too...but when i bought that journal i was somewhat
>surprised to see you had authored an article in english.
>
>
>
>
>
>if i remember, plato or aristotle thought education ought to be free...
>
>
>i had a subscription to CMJ 1988, but there was not so much music related
>software for sale at the time; now in this era, i cannot afford many books.
>
>
>so i am asking you to take the time to address ignorami like myself.
>
>
>cerberus
sotto voce: where are you +?
in mathematics the irrational designates some thing that cannot be described by
a ratio of 2 natural numbers. for example, a form of a quadratic equation like
x^2 = 2 cannot exist; rather, it is expressed in the formula x = 2/x.
x is thus a prerequisite to knowing x. in that case, isn't what the pythagorean
school confronted in the aforementioned equation already the self-referential
paradox +? a prohibition of the irrational number is in fact equal to the prohibition
of self-referentiality. however, in the context of post-cartesian, modern mathematics,
the same equation as described in x = sqrt2; and, by treating sqrt2 as a number,
the paradox is dissolved.
nevertheless, the whole movement of this expansion (invention) of numbers was
driven by a series of crises--paradox and solution--and ultimately reached cantor,
who regarded even the infinite as a number and then ended up reencountering the
paradox of self-referentiality. but it does not end there. george spencer-brown
resolved the paradox of self-referentiality by formulating it into another quadratic
equation, which francisco varela used to theorize self-organizing networks. these
examples from the current scene, however, neither diminish nor render obsolete
the importance of gödel's proof. mathematics is
constantly being invented by shifts of concept.
sotto voce: who are you +?
>your software sounds interesting, but i am not sure what it is.
my soft wear is very interesting the sleep of growth
>... or even what computer platform it runs on.
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
>so i am asking you to
http://membank.org/dataset/inter.body/propaganda.html
NN - if seeing is believing - then ... stare at me for hours, or until ... our meeting ends
-
-
-
/_/
/
\ \/ i should like to be a human plant
\/ __
__/
i will shed leaves in the shade
\_\ because i like stepping on bugs
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
Netochka Nezvanova nezvanova at eusocial.com
http://www.eusocial.com
http://www.ggttctttat.com/!
n r . 5 !!! http://steim.nl/leaves/petalz
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*-- --*--*--*--*--*--*--
More information about the Syndicate
mailing list