[syndicate] Re: Fwd: "October 100th issue"

[clement Thomas]

please subscribe.

thx
--
OG
-/ islay please ! /-
----- Original Message -----
From: "anna balint" <epistolaris at freemail.hu>
To: <syndicate at anart.no>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 10:57 PM
Subject: [syndicate] Re: Fwd: "October 100th issue"


> 7/18/02 9:16:00 PM, Diana McCarty <diana at vifu.de> wrote:
>
> >
> >anna:
> >
> >Interesting how memory works.. I recall that you were one of the first
> >women invited to join faces.. we sat in your kitchen drinking coffee.....
>
> yes, interesting enough, different memories... i cannot dig out this
story,
> not even that i have ever invited you in my kitchen.
>
> >the list not yet running. Fuzzy recollection, but you seemed uninterested
> >in women only lists  and declined the invitation.  Later, when you wanted
> >to join, if memory serves, you refused to send any bio or answer the
other
> >standard question of why you wanted to join...
>
> it was an email exchange, something that you say is non-standard bio
> [medievalist, archivist] and your refusal.
> i don't know about standard procedure, other people told me that you
> have simply put them on the list, and also that it was very boring.
> i don't know. it is told that it a a cyberfeminist list.
>
> I was curious about why you
> >had changed your mind -
>
> if it was only curiosity, than it is of course different...
> i thought it was a professional matter
> [for a list for woman working with new media, either i was not a woman,
> or not working with new media]
> the result still is, that i asked to subscribe - even if you remember
vaguely,
> and you refused. that is in my case, i don't know about mez.
>
>
>
> but that only lead to conflicting messages being
> >sent to myself and another moderator...
>
> yes, i remember that. after your refusal i wrote to kathy rae huffmann as
well,
> i related about that i wnated to join the list and she agreed  with the
refusal.
> that still does nopt change: i could not subscribe to faces.
>
> if all is matter of curosity and memories:
> [personally] i would also be curious to one thing or other, for example
what has lead you
> to become even the gatekeeper of transmediale last year,
> when you claimed in public that i have nothing to do there,
> and i had no right not even to simply appear in the hall.
> was transmediale not an open and public event?
> in my memory it comes back that you only did not scraped me,
> but you have interruputed my discussion with the Canadian cultural
attache,
> you have shouted to me, hustled me... funny event, after i did not even
see you
> since years, neither we did not have any discussion, not even an email
exchange,
> after this ominous non-subscription, if i count well  for 4 years.
> what has happened to your memory in those years [from my kitchen - to
transmediale]?
> i can never know what to expect in case that i go somewhere - i take a
shield for just in case...
>
> Open archives and publications
> >are not standard for mailing lists.
>
> finally i can agree with something: it looks that only open mailing lists
have open archives.
>
> anna balint
>
>
>
>
> >
> >diana
> >
> >
> >Frederic: I promise whiskey next time...
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


>
> -----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
> Syndicate network for media culture and media art
> information and archive: http://anart.no/~syndicate
> to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
> Shake the KKnut: http://anart.no/~syndicate/KKnut
> no commercial use of the texts without permission