nettime-l & -b

[anna balint]

Dear Peter,
it's true. Nettime bold never was the unmoderated version of nettime-l.
Starting from 2000 January and February, nettime-l has messages which do not appear
on nettime bold. If I understand well, that's because the nettime.free thread was 
misunderstood.
greetings,
anna



2/10/02 12:02:04 AM, Peter Luining <email at ctrlaltdel.org> wrote:

>
>
>anna balint wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Peter,
>> nettime bold started with the nettime.free thread in October 1998,
>> misunderstood in the end...
>
>ehhh... do we understand each other, i talked about nettime-bold
>as NOT a the unmoderated version that nettime claims it to be
>
>if i go to the info page of nettime- bold at
>http://amsterdam.nettime.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nettime-bold
>
>the first sentence i read is:
>"Nettime-bold -- the uncut, unmoderated version of nettime-l"
>
>in my eyes this means you should get everything that's on nettime-l
>+ more (the things they didn't let through for nettime-l)
>
>this is just not true, on nettime-l you see many messages that never
>appear on nettime-bold... just check a pair of regular nettime posters
>as for example geert lovinck in the nettime of -l & -b in the archives 
>of both at you see articles that are on -l & not on -b
>
>
>peter
>
>
>
>-----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
>Syndicate network for media culture and media art
>information and archive: http://anart.no/~syndicate
>to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate at anart.no>
>Shake the KKnut: http://anart.no/~syndicate/KKnut
>no commercial use of the texts without permission